-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
---
Almost nobody gets the point:
We (humans) will never be able to grab the very moment this particular
thing will get outta hands ...
It will -IN ANY CASE- be either too soon or too late ... for some.
Mr. Einstein and many others thought nuclear technology would be
necessary to beat the nazis, so ending WWII ... and then there was the
"Cold War" (whit its
milllions and millions of "victims") ... and Mr. Oppenheimer
reminded himself the (in)famous Hindu quote:
“Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds".
Will we (humans) ever find the "convenient moment" to do ...
the right thing?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.
The ancient
"mythological ethnologies" are considered obsolete by us
"moderns" because they interpret the world in a way that is animistic
and therefore "primitive", anti-scientific ... even
"incomplete".
"Science as
religion" is often cited in "literary salons" as an improbable
paradox to joke about ... I wouldn't do it! ...
Science today has
effectively become a religion, with its priests and its army and even its ...
secret police.
Science and the relative
"unconscious" force that makes it "acquit" its own
"pontificating victims" is -in a (partially) unconscious way-
preparing to become the very next ... "Holy Inquisition".
The ancient
"mythological ethnologies", unlike us moderns, were indeed
"primitive", yet they had grasped the ULTIMATE ESSENCE of the
knowledge that our new "priests" of Science lack:
What for one of them (S.
Wolfran) with a rare visionary ability defined with the term
"Computational Irreducibility" and which the ancient
"mythological wisdoms" have since the beginning ENGLOBATED: the
"cyclical" essence of the world that surrounds us and that it must be
safeguarded and protected as the most precious of goods.
The perennial search for
something "resolutive" can only lead a society conceived in this way
to self-destruction ...
In the ethnic mythologies
of the remote past it was present in a vital core, which for them was to
provide an explanation of reality and of the way already accomplished and
therefore in its deepest form ... eco-sustainable.
While for us this is just
one word among many others and like the others it can come and go according to
fashions.
Every step that involved
the change of traditions had to be explored with caution to evaluate the consequences
not only for individuals, but also for the community and above all for the
whole of Nature (today we would say for the ecosystem).
Don't take from Nature more
than what you need to live, so as not to upset the order of things more than
necessary: this is not primitive "animism" at all ...
This is a HIGHLY ADVANCED
AND SOPHISTICATED "vision" OF NATURAL REALITY ... even at a
cosmological level!!!
Something that has taken
our "Scientific" society thousands of years to figure out... but have
we really figured it out? ...
The "Computational
Irreducibility" is telling us not to despise what - of the
"Ancients" - we have not yet understood ... so well.
---------------------------------------
P.S.+
("Computational
Irreducibility") ... What's that?
I'm not a mathematician, so
I don't even dare to explain it.
I can tell you how I
interpret its meaning form a layperson's point of view:
The Science we are used to
provides us with all the things we are RAVENOUS about today thanks to the
"scientific method", i.e.: the science as we know it as laypersons
...
Science is based on
mathematics and on "assumptions", in turn mathematics is also based
on "axioms", etc. All these "big words" can be translated -
trivialized, if you want - in a synthetic way with the sentence:
"what we don't know
... we take for granted".
This is how Science
proceeds: by CHEATING!
it's like when - playing
solitaire - you ... peek (poke) at the cards.
In the sciences, the most
widespread "trick" is to hazard predictions based on
"APPROXIMATED" but often also (somehow even unawarely) arbitrary
calculations ...
According to the principle
of "Computational irreducibility", at least to some extent ...
everything ends up being ARBITRARY ... SOONER OR LATER !!!
In what sense? ...
In the final analysis, it
is NEVER POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN RELIABLE RESULTS BY TAKING "SHORTCUTS"
and this is because it is NEVER POSSIBLE TO (deep fully) KNOW WHERE THE
"ESSENTIAL" sub-PROCESSES are to be found OF ANY ONE of the main
PROCESS THAT ARE BEING STUDIED.
Science actually doesn't
just "approximate" ... but ends up -more or less involuntarily- by
DISTORT its results by "arbitrarily assuming" that part of what is
being studied is irrelevant ...
It's like taking a road
full of detours too fast to the point of missing a "turn" that could
take us somewhere else altogether... and without even realizing it.
"Computational
irreducibility" is the typical error of those who are ... always in a
hurry to get there ... and instead will never arrive ... nowhere.
---
---
Carpe Diem ..
Today it seems indisputable to rely more and more on the "certainties" that science guarantees us, be they theoretical, technological, medical and what have you ...
- Just as a religion based on love at its origins has since turned into a source of murderous, genocidal and warmongering fanaticism ...
- It is easy to see how even Science, which today seems focused on rationality in its choices, sooner or later runs the serious risk of transforming itself into a new INQUISITION ...
Starting from the signs of "fanaticism" that are already manifesting themselves in the Science community ...
Another "bad sign" is their tendency to invade the philosophers' territory with all the "weight" of their own languages ... in this way crushing to nought the right of every single human being to create their own philosophy from "whatever" starting point they see fit ... another tragic massifying convergence.
As has always happened, the most fanatic will prevail over the moderates, who will adapt for the sake of the quiet life, and become accomplices in the madness of new potential pogroms.
The first step in this direction is always some form of social polarization and ideological extremization, which then leads to the demonization of the (so-defined) "enemy" and its identification as a danger for the whole society ... hence the hatred and thirst of revenge that leads to persecutions ...
Today against those who do not accept a vaccine and ... tomorrow against those who do not adapt to the current "standard program".
Science as such has no "truth" to bestow upon us ... It is just a "method" of research and analysis, not one to draw conclusions ... If it did it would already be on a bad road ...
Remember how the first Christians were in the origins, and how they became when they eventually got in power ... Remember what they did to their own "kin" and above all to the peoples colonized in South America ... but above all keep in mind how easy it was for them ... to indulge in "divine forgiveness" to themselves in "modern" times.
There is no way to know the sooner, though by the time we'll have found out ... someone may already have ... paid a high price to it.
But of course ... "Nemo propheta in patria" ... (*)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) No one is a prophet in their own country.
---
---
---
[“fra tutti i politici italiani senza palle, emerge gloriosa una donna con due gran MELONI … e pure con i contro … fiocchi”.] (*)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This video excerpt is from a probably longer interview I found in
another blog by chance, and I don't know its origin, nor the original context.
-------------------
This post refers to the two previous ones on the same
subject.
From my point of view, in this case NON-POLITICAL, it is just an example to
refer to what I have already exposed in other previous blogs, which I will talk
about later.
In what sense do I say "NON-POLITICAL", it is important to clarify
it: In the past I have never passed even close to the political ideas to which
Ms. Meloni belongs to, nor would I ever do it for a few thousands of reasons,
not least that I'm an agnostic in the most significant and broad sense, and
even skeptical of agnoticism itself ...
So it is obvious that there can be no political and / or cultural affinity
between us. However, I have respect for the ideas of others, as long as they
are civilly expressed and duly debated.
I know that these arguments "leave the time they find" (for the English i.e.:
"they make no difference") among those who have the habit of
resorting to insult rather than reasoning and unfortunately there are more and
more ... I hope that some "survivors", among those still able to
confront, may appreciate this clarification.
Let's move on to the reasons why I recommend the visions of this useful and
instructive video, far beyond any of the "party" political aspects.
In Italy, BUT NOT ONLY !! ... Politics no longer has any horizon, it is folded
in on itself and simply is no longer up -if it ever was- to govern a country
... not even in a "Monopoly" game ...
And this is nothing! ... It is precisely the "cultural" level that
does not allow it! ... but it would be too long to explain exactly why. It
would be necessary to retrace this country recent and past history ... To cut
it short, let's say that it is now increasingly evident that this is a country
that has got ... NO BALLS.
In this context -and afaic only in this one- the video in question should be
seen as an example of what it means -in "old fashion" metaphorical
sense- to "HAVE THE BALLS" ... if I am allowed a purely MYTHOLOGICAL
reference ...
Maybe by now we should finally change our metaphors ... once and for all ...
Maybe we should say instead ... shall we say ...
... to have the ... MELONI ...
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Credits: Giorgia Meloni's interview (Journalist, Politician, Member of the Italian Parliament).
---
----------
(*) "... among all the Italian politicians without balls, a glorious woman emerges with two great MELONI (melons) ... and even with both jibs and the outer jib!".
---
---
